Stock comparison
Diamondback Energy
USA Compression Partners, LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
FANG
Diamondback Energy
Market cap
$56.46B
Sector
Energy
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
Market cap
$3.51B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
USA Compression Partners, LP USAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | FANG | USAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 57C | 69C | USAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 53C | 84A | USAC |
| Philip Fisher | 57C | 61C | USAC |
| Peter Lynch | 27F | 71C | USAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 16F | 35D | USAC |
| Charlie Munger | 47D | 68D | USAC |
| Terry Smith | 40D | 64D | USAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | FANG | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $56.46B | $3.51B |
| P/E (TTM) | 140.5x | 32.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 14.2x | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 5.09% | 8.89% |
| Gross margin | 41.83% | 51.61% |
| Net margin | 2.65% | 11.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 22.16% | 12.07% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -17.47% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 9.5x |
| Dividend yield | 2.07% | 7.08% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
FANG leads on
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 9.5x+96%
- Market cap$56.46Bvs $3.51B+94%
- Revenue CAGR 5y22.16%vs 12.07%+46%
- EV/EBIT14.2xvs 20.6x+31%
USAC leads on
- Net margin11.91%vs 2.65%+78%
- P/E (TTM)32.8xvs 140.5x+77%
- Dividend yield7.08%vs 2.07%+71%
- ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs 5.09%+43%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.