Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Manhattan Associates
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
MANH
Manhattan Associates
Market cap
$8.2B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | MANH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 69B | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 76B | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 79B | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 65B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 87A | MANH |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 81A | MANH |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 84A | MANH |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $8.2B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 36.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 26.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 76.84% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 55.56% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 19.68% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 12.98% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 20.26% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $8.2B+92%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 55.56%+37%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 12.98%+16%
- Net margin21.18%vs 19.68%+7%
MANH leads on
- ROIC (TTM)76.84%vs 12.19%+84%
- P/E (TTM)36.2xvs 80.7x+55%
- EV/EBIT26.9xvs 59.1x+54%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.5x+42%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.