Stock comparison
KLA
Manhattan Associates
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
KLAC
KLA
Market cap
$235.69B
Sector
Technology
MANH
Manhattan Associates
Market cap
$7.77B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
KLA KLAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | KLAC | MANH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 74B | 61C | KLAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 86A | 68B | KLAC |
| Philip Fisher | 82A | 71B | KLAC |
| Peter Lynch | 69B | 57C | KLAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 70B | 79B | MANH |
| Charlie Munger | 85A | 73B | KLAC |
| Terry Smith | 86A | 76B | KLAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | KLAC | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $235.69B | $7.77B |
| P/E (TTM) | 50.6x | 36.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 45.8x | 26.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 36.29% | 76.84% |
| Gross margin | 61.75% | 55.56% |
| Net margin | 35.66% | 19.68% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.13% | 12.98% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 22.65% | 20.26% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.1x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
KLAC leads on
- Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$235.69Bvs $7.77B+97%
- Net margin35.66%vs 19.68%+45%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.13%vs 12.98%+14%
MANH leads on
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 1.1x+74%
- ROIC (TTM)76.84%vs 36.29%+53%
- EV/EBIT26.9xvs 45.8x+41%
- P/E (TTM)36.2xvs 50.6x+28%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.