Stock comparison
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
SM Energy
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
NRP
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
Market cap
$1.35B
Sector
Energy
SM
SM Energy
Market cap
$3.88B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Natural Resource Partners L.P. NRP
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | NRP | SM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 77B | 45D | NRP |
| Benjamin Graham | 60C | 36D | NRP |
| Philip Fisher | 64C | 48D | NRP |
| Peter Lynch | 60C | 40D | NRP |
| Joel Greenblatt | 40D | 16F | NRP |
| Charlie Munger | 75B | 41D | NRP |
| Terry Smith | 78B | 36D | NRP |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | NRP | SM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.35B | $3.88B |
| P/E (TTM) | 12.4x | 27.0x |
| EV/EBIT | 10.3x | 11.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 17.37% | -7.7% |
| Gross margin | 84.41% | 45.11% |
| Net margin | 59.32% | 3.45% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 1.03% | 4.97% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 4.16% | 108.32% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.1x | 1.0x |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 2.67% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
NRP leads on
- ROIC (TTM)17.37%vs -7.7%+144%
- Net margin59.32%vs 3.45%+94%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 1.0x+90%
- P/E (TTM)12.4xvs 27.0x+54%
SM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y108.32%vs 4.16%+96%
- Revenue CAGR 5y4.97%vs 1.03%+79%
- Market cap$3.88Bvs $1.35B+65%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.