Stock comparison
SM Energy
Texas Pacific Land
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
SM
SM Energy
Market cap
$3.88B
Sector
Energy
TPL
Texas Pacific Land
Market cap
$27.73B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Texas Pacific Land TPL
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | SM | TPL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 45D | 81A | TPL |
| Benjamin Graham | 36D | 91A | TPL |
| Philip Fisher | 48D | 89A | TPL |
| Peter Lynch | 40D | 80A | TPL |
| Joel Greenblatt | 16F | 75C | TPL |
| Charlie Munger | 41D | 92A | TPL |
| Terry Smith | 36D | 97A | TPL |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SM | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.88B | $27.73B |
| P/E (TTM) | 27.0x | 54.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.9x | 45.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | -7.7% | 29.83% |
| Gross margin | 45.11% | 97.7% |
| Net margin | 3.45% | 60.03% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 4.97% | 15.34% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 108.32% | 15.89% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.0x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 0.55% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
SM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y108.32%vs 15.89%+85%
- Dividend yield2.67%vs 0.55%+79%
- EV/EBIT11.9xvs 45.8x+74%
- P/E (TTM)27.0xvs 54.4x+50%
TPL leads on
- ROIC (TTM)29.83%vs -7.7%+126%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 1.0x+99%
- Net margin60.03%vs 3.45%+94%
- Market cap$27.73Bvs $3.88B+86%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.