Stock comparison
Winmark
Yum China Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
WINA
Winmark
Market cap
$1.31B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
Market cap
$15.64B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Winmark WINA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | WINA | YUMC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 80A | 31F | WINA |
| Benjamin Graham | 77B | 57C | WINA |
| Philip Fisher | 66B | 20F | WINA |
| Peter Lynch | 64C | 48D | WINA |
| Joel Greenblatt | 69B | 28F | WINA |
| Charlie Munger | 57C | 22F | WINA |
| Terry Smith | 58C | 21F | WINA |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | WINA | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.31B | $15.64B |
| P/E (TTM) | 31.6x | 17.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 24.5x | 12.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 2.43% | 12.18% |
| Gross margin | 96.66% | 17.23% |
| Net margin | 48.19% | 7.83% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.42% | 4.6% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 1.92% | 1.86% |
| Debt / Equity | - | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 3.84% | 2.13% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
WINA leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+126%
- ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 12.18%+95%
- Net margin48.19%vs 7.83%+84%
- Gross margin96.66%vs 17.23%+82%
YUMC leads on
- Market cap$15.64Bvs $1.31B+92%
- EV/EBIT12.4xvs 24.5x+49%
- Revenue CAGR 5y4.6%vs 2.42%+48%
- P/E (TTM)17.7xvs 31.6x+44%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.